Buddhist Shaolin way of accession to the WTO should not be used

 Posted by Notes generate such a response unexpected, for which he has removed contact the blog, he said: That's it, it will mislead a lot of people, not my intention. hereinafter referred to as This post will mislead many people, this is also what kind of misleading?
of the original: I'm not afraid of misleading my article, I was worried about speculation by some websites, this will make some people have of Buddhism (bad) and impression.
Reporter: Some Internet users question, your post is to advertise the Great Mercy Temple to play down the temple, how do you see? whether it is your intention to do publicity for the Great Mercy Temple?
original: I want to advertise Great Mercy Temple, the Great Mercy Temple is the representative of the mainland of China Dhamma.
mind: Why do you say?
original: some bad words to say to you, I just told you some of my real thoughts and motives.
Reporter: Some Internet users say that you only see the commercial side of the Shaolin Temple, Shaolin Temple has still not seen to carry forward for the promotion of Buddhism and doing a great contribution to Chinese culture? how do you see?
Original: Shaolin do whatever How many good things should be, is normal. But all must be built on the premise of following the precepts of the Buddha under the system. As a Buddhist temple, but also the birthplace of Zen Buddhism, Shaolin monks in addition to providing a place Kiyonaga , but also quiet of the world, Purdue beings, which is the realization of Buddhist psychology and ethics function, and take the appropriate charity, this is the main Buddhist.
mind: how do you view the abbot of Shaolin Temple and Shaolin Temple now Enterprising? such behavior be okay?
original: Buddhism should be accession to the WTO, the establishment of the future development of Buddhism Buddhism is the only way the spread, but not by way of the Shaolin Temple. Now there's tourism Buddhism, Buddhist dance, performance Buddhism, only the fundamental Buddhist serious injury. (Note: respondents were asked, the paper